Georgia has just finished her doctorate on representations of madness in contemporary Scottish writing in the School of English Drama and the Arts at Loughborough. Her academic interests are in contemporary literature, especially Alice Thompson and Janice Galloway, and critical theory, particularly queer and affect theory. She is also project assistant for the Gendered Lives Research Group. Currently, she convenes a module on Postmodern America, and has recently lectured on Luce Irigaray, Virginie Despentes, Margaret Atwood, Siri Hustvedt and Claudia Rankine. Previously she has taught on Narrative Forms and Fictions, the theory modules Critical Studies One and Two (now deceased) and a module on the Victorian Bildungsroman. She divides her time between Loughborough and Sheffield, where she helps organise feminist arts events with LaDIYfest Sheffield, occasionally writes a blog about the lived experience of gender (which you can read here), and plays a lot of football.
This Wednesday saw the second Gendered Lives research seminar, with talks from Dr Tim Reinke-Williams (Senior Lecturer in History, Northampton) and Dr Sara Read (Lecturer in English, Loughborough). Tim’s talk took as its starting point the way that the wounded male body has been theorised as porous or leaky, and thus, by implication, as in some way feminised by the experience of wounding or blood-letting. To complicate this model, the paper drew our attention to the fact that such theories of the body rest largely on representations of wounding in seventeenth-century drama, whereas more personal texts such as letters (particularly of the civil war period), tend to present wounds and scarring as denoting exceptional bravery, thus proving, rather than problematising, the injured man’s masculinity. Religious poetry written by women after miscarrying was the subject of Sara’s discussion; in it, she drew a fascinating comparison between the experience of bodily suffering and devotional practice in seventeenth-century life writing. Arguing that their faith gave these women a way of understanding their physical pain as a form of divine love, Sara suggested that many of the writers under discussion believed that ‘the more bodily suffering she experienced the more enlightened she would become’. Both talks drew on a wide range of sources, from legal documents and private letters through to devotional poetry, to explore how gendered bodily ordeals were understood as speaking to larger social and religious concerns in the period. Pairing two speakers from different disciplines (History and English) made for a fascinating Q and A session, in which the differing analytic frameworks used by the speakers engaged in a productive and thought-provoking way. After a lively discussion, we also had the pleasure of an even livelier dinner. Thanks to everyone who contributed to the discussion and made the evening such a convivial event!